Two hundred twenty male students randomly selected during Spring semester 1988 from each of two Saudi Arabian universities, King Faisal and King Fand, were given a three-part attitude dimension instrument and a fourpart Health-Related Physical Fitness Test. The attitude dimension instrument, derived from the McDonald Attitude Inventory and the Wear Inventory as altered by Ridha (1983), included 70 statements. Subjects responded on a five-point scale ranging from Strongly Consent to Strongly Disagree.
The Health-Related Physical Fitness Test, developed by the American Alliance for Health, consisted of 12-minute run, skinfold dimension, sit-up, and sit down and reach assessments. A complete of 316 students completed both tests. Values were assigned to replies on the attitude dimension instrument according to the Likert technique. These total results, along with Health-Related Physical Fitness Test scores, were statistically examined by multiple regression, t-test, MANOVA, and the Spearman-Brown method. Findings demonstrated a positive relationship between attitude toward physical education and ratings on the Health-Related Physical Fitness Test. No significant difference in attitude toward physical education was found between students at both universities, but King Fand students scored significantly better than King Faisal students on the Health-Related Physical Fitness Test.
- Ginger water
- 5 Hacks WHICH WILL Make You a Better Exerciser
- Exchange of favors and resources is wonderful for everyone’s budget
- Measuring progress
- Find you Why-Power
Between freshman and sophomore students, a significant difference in attitude toward physical education was found at King Faisal University but not at King Fand University. No significant difference was within attitude toward physical education between sophomore students at King Fand University examined in Ridha’s 1983 study and those tested in the present study. Comparison of Health-Related Physical Fitness Test outcomes to American college student norms demonstrated that American students have scored better in distance in 9 minutes run, sit-ups, and skinfold measurement, while the Saudi students obtained in the sit and reach test better.
Some of these also give you the ability to remote control the music, camera, video and much more. Depending on your needs you should choose a tracker to provide all of your purposes flawlessly. Style – If you care about the aesthetic of the tracker, you should watch out for the option to improve the wristband, clock style, wallpaper changing, and different such customization options.
Most of the trackers in the above list have multiple style options so that the screen is noticeable under the sun as well as in the dark. Other than these, you can also look out for compatibility with your smartphone OS version to enable you to set up their company’s app on your smartphone and connect your device through Bluetooth for more insights on the data.
The battery life may also be taken into account. The standard electric battery life is 5 days with normal usage but some of these can handle sustaining for 7 to 10 days. Lastly, you should take your wrist width under consideration as a few of the trackers aren’t suitable for too slim or too large wrists.
You can buy the above-mentioned top 15 best waterproof activity trackers in 2019 to monitor all your activities each day whether you are on land or water. But continue to keep the parameters listed above in mind while shortlisting and choosing one from them to buy for you so that you never repent after purchasing the tracker.